12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Austone Athena SP-701 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Austone
Athena SP-701
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
14
3
Beste positie
#10
#8
#2
Gemiddelde positie
10.0
13.4
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
32
153
40

Nat

Nat
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Austone Athena SP-701
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Austone Athena SP-701
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Austone Athena SP-701
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Austone Athena SP-701
35%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%

Droog

Droog
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Austone Athena SP-701
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Droge behandeling
Austone Athena SP-701
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Austone Athena SP-701
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Soelaas

Soelaas
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Austone Athena SP-701
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking