Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP vs. Vredestein Ultrac+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Apollo

Aspire XP

R16 – R19

VS

Premie

Vredestein

Vergelijk ook met

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Aspire XP

Ultrac+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Aantal tests

9

3

4

5

Beste positie

#4

#10

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

8.6

10.7

3.3

2.8

Laatste test

2020

2026

Beschikbare maten

51

79

40

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Apollo Aspire XP

74%

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Apollo Aspire XP

75%

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Apollo Aspire XP

81%

Vredestein Ultrac+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Apollo Aspire XP

69%

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Apollo Aspire XP

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Apollo Aspire XP

77%

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Droog

Apollo Aspire XP

82%

Vredestein Ultrac+

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Droogremmen

Apollo Aspire XP

85%

Vredestein Ultrac+

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Droge behandeling

Apollo Aspire XP

84%

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Kosten

Apollo Aspire XP

71%

Vredestein Ultrac+

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Rolweerstand

Apollo Aspire XP

73%

Vredestein Ultrac+

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Kilometrage

Apollo Aspire XP

67%

Vredestein Ultrac+

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Soelaas

Apollo Aspire XP

88%

Vredestein Ultrac+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Buitengeluid

Apollo Aspire XP

88%

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Apollo Aspire XP vs Giti Gitisport S2

Apollo Aspire XP vs Avon ZV7

Apollo Aspire XP vs Viking Protech NewGen

Apollo Aspire XP vs Vredestein ULTRAC+

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Viking Protech NewGen

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Avon ZV7

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Michelin Primacy 5

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP vs. Vredestein Ultrac+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Aspire XP

Ultrac+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking