12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Apollo
Aspire XP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
9
4
29
14
Beste positie
#4
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
8.6
3.3
3.7
3.6
Laatste test
2020
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
51
40
180
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Apollo Aspire XP
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Aspire XP
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Aspire XP
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Aspire XP
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Aspire XP
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Natte zijgeleiding
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Droog
Apollo Aspire XP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Apollo Aspire XP
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Apollo Aspire XP
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droge stuurrespons
Apollo Aspire XP
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Droog rijgedrag
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Kosten
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Apollo Aspire XP
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Soelaas
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store