12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Testprofiel

Apollo
Aspire XP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Aantal tests
9
18
10
4
49
Beste positie
#4
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
8.6
6.1
6.0
3.3
3.2
Laatste test
2020
2024
2026
2026
2024
Beschikbare maten
51
47
109
40
213

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Apollo Aspire XP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Aspire XP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Aspire XP
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Aspire XP
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Aspire XP
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Droog
Apollo Aspire XP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Droogremmen
Apollo Aspire XP
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Droge behandeling
Apollo Aspire XP
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Droge stuurrespons
Apollo Aspire XP
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Droog rijgedrag
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Kosten
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Rolweerstand
Apollo Aspire XP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Kilometrage
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Prijs/waarde
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Soelaas
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Soelaas
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store