12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Apollo
Aspire XP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
9
18
3
4
3
Beste positie
#4
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
8.6
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.3
Laatste test
2020
2024
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
51
47
36
40
23

Nat

Nat
Apollo Aspire XP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Aspire XP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Aspire XP
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Aspire XP
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Aspire XP
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Natte zijgeleiding
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Droog

Droog
Apollo Aspire XP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Droogremmen
Apollo Aspire XP
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Droge behandeling
Apollo Aspire XP
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Droge stuurrespons
Apollo Aspire XP
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolweerstand
Apollo Aspire XP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometrage
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Soelaas
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking