Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Apollo

Aspire XP

R16 – R19

VS

Budget

CST

Vergelijk ook met

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Aspire XP

Medallion MD-A1

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

9

2

10

4

Beste positie

#4

#10

#2

Gemiddelde positie

8.6

21.5

6.0

3.3

Laatste test

2020

2019

2026

Beschikbare maten

51

264

109

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Apollo Aspire XP

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Apollo Aspire XP

75%

CST Medallion MD-A1

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Apollo Aspire XP

81%

CST Medallion MD-A1

99%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Apollo Aspire XP

69%

CST Medallion MD-A1

29%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Apollo Aspire XP

87%

CST Medallion MD-A1

24%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Apollo Aspire XP

77%

CST Medallion MD-A1

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Droog

Apollo Aspire XP

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Droogremmen

Apollo Aspire XP

85%

CST Medallion MD-A1

22%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Droge behandeling

Apollo Aspire XP

84%

CST Medallion MD-A1

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Kosten

Apollo Aspire XP

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolweerstand

Apollo Aspire XP

73%

CST Medallion MD-A1

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Kilometrage

Apollo Aspire XP

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Soelaas

Apollo Aspire XP

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Buitengeluid

Apollo Aspire XP

88%

CST Medallion MD-A1

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Soelaas

Apollo Aspire XP

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Apollo Aspire XP vs Giti Gitisport S2

Apollo Aspire XP vs Avon ZV7

Apollo Aspire XP vs Viking Protech NewGen

Apollo Aspire XP vs Vredestein ULTRAC+

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Maxxis Premitra HP5

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aspire XP

Medallion MD-A1

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking