Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Viking WinTech vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Budget

Apollo

Aspire XP Winter

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Aspire XP Winter

WinTech

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak LM-005

Aantal tests

8

6

10

49

Best position

#1

#11

#2

#1

Average position

13.6

20.8

12.2

3.2

Laatste test

2025

2024

Beschikbare maten

29

59

207

213

Nat

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

66%

Viking WinTech

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

56%

Viking WinTech

52%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

59%

Viking WinTech

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

55%

Viking WinTech

46%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

81%

Viking WinTech

52%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

83%

Viking WinTech

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Sneeuw

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

69%

Viking WinTech

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Tractie op sneeuw

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

62%

Viking WinTech

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Remmen op sneeuw

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

63%

Viking WinTech

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Sneeuw in bochten

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

72%

Viking WinTech

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Sneeuwverwerking

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

77%

Viking WinTech

47%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Kosten

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

66%

Viking WinTech

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kilometrage

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

28%

Viking WinTech

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Rolweerstand

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Prijs/waarde

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Droog

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

65%

Viking WinTech

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Droogremmen

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

41%

Viking WinTech

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Droge behandeling

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

89%

Viking WinTech

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Soelaas

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

76%

Viking WinTech

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Soelaas

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Buitengeluid

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

76%

Viking WinTech

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Ijs

Viking WinTech

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Remmen op ijs

Viking WinTech

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2023	225/45 R18	Bekijk

Vergelijking: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Viking WinTech vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Aspire XP Winter

WinTech

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Nat

Sneeuw

Kosten

Droog

Soelaas

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Wederzijdse tests

Voeg toe aan vergelijking