12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Apollo Apterra HP vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Apollo
Apterra HP
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
3
6
3
Beste positie
#10
#5
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
10.0
7.3
4.7
3.7
Laatste test
2017
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
1
59
146
36

Nat

Nat
Apollo Apterra HP
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Apterra HP
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Apterra HP
53%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Apterra HP
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Apterra HP
48%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Apterra HP
83%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Droog

Droog
Apollo Apterra HP
52%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Apollo Apterra HP
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Apollo Apterra HP
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Apollo Apterra HP
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Apterra HP
69%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking