Vergelijking: Apollo Apterra HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Barum Polaris 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Apollo

Apterra HP

R18

VS

Premie

GoodYear

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Apterra HP

Efficientgrip SUV

Polaris 6

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

1

—

3

23

Beste positie

#10

—

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

10.0

—

7.0

3.3

Laatste test

2017

—

2025

Beschikbare maten

1

123

99

176

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Apollo Apterra HP

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Barum Polaris 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Apollo Apterra HP

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Barum Polaris 6

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Apollo Apterra HP

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Barum Polaris 6

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Apollo Apterra HP

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Barum Polaris 6

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Apollo Apterra HP

48%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Apollo Apterra HP

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Barum Polaris 6

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Droog

Apollo Apterra HP

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Droog rijgedrag

Apollo Apterra HP

48%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Kosten

Apollo Apterra HP

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Barum Polaris 6

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometrage

Apollo Apterra HP

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Barum Polaris 6

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Soelaas

Apollo Apterra HP

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Barum Polaris 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Buitengeluid

Apollo Apterra HP

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Barum Polaris 6

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Inwendig geluid

Apollo Apterra HP

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Apollo Apterra HP vs Firestone Roadhawk 2

Apollo Apterra HP vs Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Apollo Apterra HP vs Nokian Line SUV

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Viking WinTech

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Radar Dimax Alpine

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Apollo Aspire XP Winter

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Nexen N blue 4 Season 2

Barum Polaris 6 vs Semperit Speed-Grip 5

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Apollo Apterra HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Barum Polaris 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Apterra HP

Efficientgrip SUV

Polaris 6

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking