12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Apollo Apterra HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofiel

Apollo
Apterra HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Aantal tests
1
18
3
10
Beste positie
#10
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
10.0
6.1
3.7
2.1
Laatste test
2017
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
1
47
36
195

Nat

Nat
Apollo Apterra HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Apterra HP
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Apterra HP
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Apterra HP
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Apterra HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Apterra HP
48%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Apollo Apterra HP
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Apterra HP
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%

Droog

Droog
Apollo Apterra HP
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Apollo Apterra HP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kilometrage
Apollo Apterra HP
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking