12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
1
23
14
Beste positie
#6
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
3.3
3.6
Laatste test
2018
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
25
176
188

Nat

Nat
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Inwendig geluid
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Droog

Droog
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Droog rijgedrag
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%

Kosten

Kosten
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kilometrage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking