12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
1
24
14
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
2.7
3.6
Laatste test
2018
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
25
302
188

Nat

Nat
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kilometrage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Inwendig geluid
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Droog

Droog
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking