12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Falken
EuroWinter HS02
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
1
4
24
Best position
#6
#7
#1
Average position
6.0
12.3
2.7
Laatste test
2018
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
25
98
302

Nat

Nat
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
48%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Kilometrage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Inwendig geluid
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Droog

Droog
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking