12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Apollo
Alnac 4G
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
8
4
49
28
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
18.9
3.3
3.2
2.3
Laatste test
2023
2026
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
77
40
213
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Apollo Alnac 4G
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Apollo Alnac 4G
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Apollo Alnac 4G
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Apollo Alnac 4G
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droog
Apollo Alnac 4G
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Apollo Alnac 4G
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droog rijgedrag
Apollo Alnac 4G
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Droge behandeling
Apollo Alnac 4G
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Soelaas
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Apollo Alnac 4G
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Apollo Alnac 4G
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Apollo Alnac 4G
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Apollo Alnac 4G
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Apollo Alnac 4G
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Rolweerstand
Apollo Alnac 4G
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store